Tether Tulips
Audit · firm’s term: audit report
Cyberscope reviewed Tether Tulips on 11 Jun 2022: 8 findings, 0 critical; none marked fixed.
No open critical findings
Open the reportOpen Tether Tulips’s security record
Report stored on IPFS. Content hash bafkreie2egesnxktfm3x5gcmrnkik254htss4var76m36yka5brpcu42kq
Trustblock does not review code.
Findings8
Statuses are the security firm’s own, from its report.
| Severity | Open | Acknowledged | Fixed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Critical | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| High | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Medium | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Low | 8 | 0 | 0 |
LowL01 - Public Function could be Declared ExternalOpen
The report gives no description here.
LowL04 - Conformance to Solidity Naming ConventionsOpen
The report gives no description here.
LowL05 - Unused State VariableOpen
The report gives no description here.
LowL07 - Missing Events ArithmeticOpen
The report gives no description here.
LowL09 - Dead Code EliminationOpen
The report gives no description here.
LowL12 - Using Variables before DeclarationOpen
The report gives no description here.
LowL14 - Uninitialized Variables in Local ScopeOpen
The report gives no description here.
LowL15 - Local Scope Variable ShadowingOpen
The report gives no description here.
Contracts in scope1
| Address | Chain | Source code |
|---|---|---|
| 0x9fba4c6fa59c832fc56c30a3f384bb8f0e30ff05 | Chain: BNB Chain | Source code: Verified source |
Part of Tether Tulips’s security record
Tether Tulips
Audits1 audit by 1 firmLast audit Jun 2022, by Cyberscope.
Critical findingsNo open critical findingsIn 1 report.
Open Tether Tulips’s security recordSecurity firm
Cyberscope1,783 projects reviewed · 2,056 reports · latest Oct 2026
See Cyberscope’s auditsSomething wrong on this page? A missing report, a wrong date, a finding that was fixed since. Tell us and we check it against its source.
Tell us