Alchemy Modular Account

QuantstampFiles named in the report

Quantstamp reviewed Alchemy ERC (Alchemy Modular Account) on 30 Jan 2024: 33 findings, 0 critical; 21 marked fixed, 11 acknowledged, 1 open.

No open critical findings
Open the reportOpen Alchemy ERC’s security record

Report hosted on certificate.quantstamp.com.

Trustblock does not review code.

Findings33

Statuses are the security firm’s own, from its report.

SeverityOpenAcknowledgedFixed
Critical000
High002
Medium123
Low0916
MediumOther Plugins May Enable Runtime Execution of Session KeysOpen

As mentioned in the code comments at L245-L247, session keys are only expected to be used in the user operation context. Therefore, `SessionKeyPlugin` does not define the runtime validation function for `executeWithSessionKey()`, with the assumption that any function call in runtime to `executeWithSessionKey()` will revert due to the lack of validation function. In usual cases, such design should work as expected since `UpgradeableModularAccount` reverts with a `RuntimeValidationFunctionMissing()` error if the validation function corresponding to a runtime call does not exist, except the cases for self-calls to `installPlugin()` or `upgradeToAndCall()`. However, any other installed plugin can add a runtime validation function to `executeWithSessionKey()`, enabling and allowing session keys in runtime. Also, during the runtime call, the session key validation implemented in `userOpValidationFunction()` will be bypassed and not enforced.

Contracts in scope

No deployed address is recorded for this audit.

The report names a repository or files. Open the report to see its scope.

Repository and files the report names (1)

  • src/*.sol

Part of Alchemy ERC’s security record

Alchemy ERC
Audits6 audits by 1 firmLast audit May 2025, by Quantstamp.
Critical findingsNo open critical findingsAcross 6 reports.
Open Alchemy ERC’s security record

Security firm

Quantstamp

236 projects reviewed · 332 reports · latest Oct 2026

See Quantstamp’s audits

Something wrong on this page? A missing report, a wrong date, a finding that was fixed since. Tell us and we check it against its source.

Tell us