Xpat Ink
Audit · firm’s term: audit report
Cyberscope reviewed Xpat Ink on 25 Feb 2023: 13 findings, 0 critical; none marked fixed.
Trustblock does not review code.
Findings13
Statuses are the security firm’s own, from its report.
| Severity | Open | Acknowledged | Fixed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Critical | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| High | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Medium | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Low | 13 | 0 | 0 |
LowIDI - Immutable Declaration ImprovementOpen
The report gives no description here.
LowL02 - State Variables could be Declared ConstantOpen
The report gives no description here.
LowL04 - Conformance to Solidity Naming ConventionsOpen
The report gives no description here.
LowL06 - Missing Events Access ControlOpen
The report gives no description here.
LowL07 - Missing Events ArithmeticOpen
The report gives no description here.
LowL09 - Dead Code EliminationOpen
The report gives no description here.
LowL11 - Unnecessary Boolean equalityOpen
The report gives no description here.
LowL14 - Uninitialized Variables in Local ScopeOpen
The report gives no description here.
LowL19 - Stable Compiler VersionOpen
The report gives no description here.
LowL20 - Succeeded Transfer CheckOpen
The report gives no description here.
Show 3 more
LowPVC - Price Volatility ConcernOpen
The report gives no description here.
LowRS - Redundant StatementsOpen
The report gives no description here.
LowUSV - Unused State VariablesOpen
The report gives no description here.
Contracts in scope1
| Address | Chain | Source code |
|---|---|---|
| 0xc1f7f6d6338707a362f35289d882f12f364c2785 | Chain: BNB Chain | Source code: Verified source |
Part of Xpat Ink’s security record
Xpat InkSecurity firm
Cyberscope1,782 projects reviewed · 2,055 reports · latest Oct 2026
See Cyberscope’s auditsSomething wrong on this page? A missing report, a wrong date, a finding that was fixed since. Tell us and we check it against its source.
Tell us