Potter Pig|
Audit · firm’s term: audit report
Cyberscope reviewed Potter Pig (Potter Pig|) on 12 Feb 2023: 11 findings, 1 critical; none marked fixed.
Trustblock does not review code.
Findings11
Statuses are the security firm’s own, from its report.
| Severity | Open | Acknowledged | Fixed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Critical | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| High | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Medium | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Low | 9 | 0 | 0 |
CriticalELFM - Exceeds Fees LimitOpen
The report gives no description here.
MediumZD - Zero DivisionOpen
The report gives no description here.
LowL02 - State Variables could be Declared ConstantOpen
The report gives no description here.
LowL04 - Conformance to Solidity Naming ConventionsOpen
The report gives no description here.
LowL07 - Missing Events ArithmeticOpen
The report gives no description here.
LowL09 - Dead Code EliminationOpen
The report gives no description here.
LowL16 - Validate Variable SettersOpen
The report gives no description here.
LowL17 - Usage of Solidity AssemblyOpen
The report gives no description here.
LowL19 - Stable Compiler VersionOpen
The report gives no description here.
LowPTRP - Potential Transfer Revert PropagationOpen
The report gives no description here.
Show 1 more
LowPVC - Price Volatility ConcernOpen
The report gives no description here.
Contracts in scope1
| Address | Chain | Source code |
|---|---|---|
| 0x3fd7ee4a8ae0389763b080c871e1827b167c3cbd | Chain: BNB Chain | Source code: Verified source |
Part of Potter Pig’s security record
Security firm
Cyberscope1,784 projects reviewed · 2,059 reports · latest Oct 2026
See Cyberscope’s auditsSomething wrong on this page? A missing report, a wrong date, a finding that was fixed since. Tell us and we check it against its source.
Tell us