SSV.network

QuantstampFiles named in the report

Quantstamp reviewed SSV Network (SSV.network) on 21 Jul 2023: 25 findings, 0 critical; 6 marked fixed, 17 acknowledged, 2 open.

No open critical findings
Open the reportOpen SSV Network’s security record

Report hosted on certificate.quantstamp.com.

Trustblock does not review code.

Findings25

Statuses are the security firm’s own, from its report.

SeverityOpenAcknowledgedFixed
Critical000
High000
Medium023
Low2153
LowColluding Operators Can Act Maliciously on Behalf of a ValidatorOpen

Validators split their validator private keys into key shares using Shamir Secret Sharing and encrypt them for use by a set of operators. These operators use the key shares to propose blocks or make attestations on behalf of the validator. However, if an individual or group of operators possesses the "quorum" number of key shares, they can recover the validator's private key and make unilateral decisions that may lead to slashing. It is important to note that an operator may obtain multiple key shares in two ways: by registering as an operator multiple times when setting up a new cluster or by colluding with others who have registered as operators and sharing key shares with one another. If a cluster contains colluding operators, they can act maliciously and cause a slashing event by using their key shares to make decisions on behalf of the validator. To prevent such malicious activity, validators should carefully select trusted, high-performing, and decentralized operators for their clusters. It is critical to communicate this risk to validators and emphasize the importance of proper operator selection and monitoring. It is also important to note that Ethereum 2 validators have a signing key and a withdrawal key, and only the signing key is provided to operators, which prevents colluding operators from withdrawing the validator's staked ETH.

LowMissing Access ControlsOpen

All externally callable functions in the following contracts are callable by anyone as they do not employ any kind of access controls: 1. `SSVClusters.sol`. 1. `SSVDAO.sol`. 1. `SSVOperators.sol`. Direct calls to these functions circumvent the access controls performed in contract `SSVNetwork.sol`. However, performing direct calls will lead to uncontrolled storage reads/writes (`SSVStorage.load()` and `SSVStorageProtocol.load()` will be relative to the called contract and not `SSVNetwork.sol`, which holds the correct global state) and no path of exploitation was found during the audit.

Contracts in scope

No deployed address is recorded for this audit.

The report names a repository or files. Open the report to see its scope.

Repository and files the report names (9)

  • contracts/libraries/OperatorLib.sol
  • contracts/libraries/ClusterLib.sol
  • contracts/ISSVNetworkCore.sol
  • contracts/ISSVNetwork.sol
  • contracts/SSVNetworkViews.sol
  • contracts/libraries/Types.sol
  • contracts/libraries/NetworkLib.sol
  • contracts/SSVNetwork.sol
  • contracts/ISSVNetworkViews.sol

Part of SSV Network’s security record

SSV Network
Audits2 audits by 2 firmsLast audit Nov 2024, by ChainSecurity.
Critical findingsNo open critical findingsAcross 2 reports.
Open SSV Network’s security record

Security firm

Quantstamp

236 projects reviewed · 332 reports · latest Oct 2026

See Quantstamp’s audits

Something wrong on this page? A missing report, a wrong date, a finding that was fixed since. Tell us and we check it against its source.

Tell us