DexEagleEye
Summary
contracts, & make informed trading decisions. You can also use it through our website. DexEagleEye & its AiBot de- liver top-tier security & convenience, managed exclusively by you.\newline Be part of the future! Chain Solana Language Rust (Token-Program) 7q7PFmX5Gg4k6mFkmPGRzunH6uBpYgwLuQ2uuDtxg- Codebase Mjh Commit N/A Unit Tests N/A Social Medias Telegram https://t.me/DeXeEAi Twitter https://x.com/DeXeEAi Facebook N/A https://www.instagram.com/dexeeai?igsh= Instagram eW5pbTZzZTV6YzNl&utm_source=qr GitHub N/A Reddit N/A Medium N/A Discord N/A YouTube https://www.youtube.com/@DeXeEAi TikTok N/A LinkedIn N/A CoinMarketCap N/A Audit Summary Version Delivery Date Change Log • Layout Project • Automated/Manual- v1.0 29 July, 2024 Security Review • Summary Note - The following audit report presents a comprehensive security anal- ysis of the smart contract utilized in the project. This analysis did not in- clude functional testing (or unit testing) of the contract’s logic. We cannot guarantee 100% logical correctness of the contract as it was not functionally tested by us. File Overview The Team provided us with the files that should be tested in the security assessment. This audit covered the following files listed below with a SHA-1 Hash. 1. see codebase Please note: Files with a different hash value than in this table have been mod- ified after the security check, either intentionally or unintentionally. A different hash value may (but need not) be an indication of a changed state or potential vulnerability that was not the subject of this scan. Imported packages Used code from other Frameworks/Smart Contracts (direct imports). 1. see codebase Please note: Files with a different hash value than in this table have been mod- ified after the security check, either intentionally or unintentionally. A different hash value may (but need not) be an indication of a changed state or potential vulnerability that was not the subject of this scan. Audit Information Vulnerability & Risk Level Risk represents the probability that a certain source-threat will exploit vul- nerability, and the impact of that event on the organization or system. Risk Level is computed based on CVSS version 3.0. Level Value Vulnerability Risk (Required Action) A vulnerability that can disrupt the contract functioning in a number Immediate action to re- Critical 9 - 10 of scenarios, or creates duce risk level. a risk that the contract may be broken. A vulnerability that affects the desired out- come when using a Implementation of cor- High 7 - 8.9 contract, or provides the rective actions as soon as opportunity to use a con- possible. tract in an unintended way. A vulnerability that could affect the desired out- Implementation of cor- Medium 4 - 6.9 come of executing the rective actions in a cer- contract in a specific sce- tain period. nario. A vulnerability that does not have a significant im- Implementation of cer- pact on possible scenar- Low 2 - 3.9 tain corrective actions or ios for the use of the con- accepting the risk. tract and is probably sub- jective. A vulnerability that have An observation that does informational character Informational 0 - 1.9 not determine a level of but is not effecting any risk. of the code. Auditing Strategy and Techniques Applied Throughout the review process, care was taken to check the repository for security- related issues, code quality, and compliance with specifications and best practices. To this end, our team of experienced pen-testers and smart contract developers reviewed the code line by line and documented any issues discovered. We check every file manually. We use automated tools only so that they help us achieve faster and better results. Methodolgy The auditing process follows a routine series of steps: 1. Code review that includes the following: a. Reviewing the specifications, sources, and instructions provided to SolidProof to ensure we understand the size, scope, and functionality of the smart contract. b. Manual review of the code, i.e., reading the source code line by line to identify potential vulnerabilities. c. Comparison to the specification, i.e., verifying that the code does what is described in the specifications, sources, and instructions provided to SolidProof. 2. Testing and automated analysis that includes the following: a. Test coverage analysis, which determines whether test cases actually cover code and how much code is executed when those test cases are executed. b. Symbolic execution, which is analysing a program to determine what inputs causes each part of a program to execute. 3. Review best practices, i.e., review smart contracts to improve efficiency, effectiveness, clarity, maintainability, security, and control based on best practices, recommendations, and research from industry and academia. 4. Concrete, itemized and actionable recommendations to help you se- cure your smart contracts.
No issues
Contract (1)
| # | Chain | Address | Scanner |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Solana | 7q7PFmX5Gg4k6mFkmPGRzunH6uBpYgwLuQ2uuDtxgMjh | Check on Solscan |