Reactive Network security record

BNB Chain, Ethereumreactive.network

As of 3 Nov 2026, Reactive Network has 1 audit report on Trustblock, by QuillAudits, dated 11 Feb 2025. That report lists no open critical findings.

Critical findings
No open critical findings
In 1 report.
Open the latest report
Your label, live
Get the label for your site

Record last updated . It holds audits and findings, contracts and incidents up to Nov 2026. Trustblock does not review code.

Audits1

Newest first

AuditSecurity firmDateScopeCritical findingsReport
Reactive NetworkSecurity firm: QuillAuditsDate: Scope: Files named in the reportNo open critical findingsOpen · quillaudits.com

Findings5

Statuses are the security firm’s own, from each report.

SeverityOpenAcknowledgedFixed
Critical000
High002
Medium101
Low100
MediumLack of Refund Mechanism on Failed Transfers in Bridge to Bridge Interaction ScenarioReactive Network · QuillAudits · 11 Feb 2025Open

In the current bridge implementation, once a transfer message is confirmed and successfully relayed from the source bridge to the destination bridge, the user's funds are effectively deducted from the source chain. However, if the transaction fails on the destination bridge due to any factors, the bridge does not provide a mechanism to refund the user’s assets.This issue specifically arises in BRIDGE <-> BRIDGE interactions, where one bridge communicates directly with another bridge without involving the ReactiveBridge (RNBRIDGE). Since BRIDGE <-> RNBRIDGE interactions are the intended, the lack of a refund mechanism is only a concern when bridges interact directly with each other. In such cases, users may face an irreversible loss of funds, exposing them to financial risk.

Open the report
LowLack of Test Coverage in the Bridge ContractReactive Network · QuillAudits · 11 Feb 2025Open

The bridge contract currently lacks a comprehensive testing suite, which poses significant risks to its reliability, security, and functionality. Without unit and integration tests, there is no systematic way to verify that the contract behaves as intended across different scenarios, including edge cases and failure conditions. This absence of testing increases the likelihood of undetected vulnerabilities, incorrect logic implementation, and potential financial losses due to undiagnosed bugs.

Open the report

Contracts

No deployed address is recorded for these audits.

The reports name a repository or files. Open a report to see its scope.

The repositories and files the reports name

Show this on your site

Is this your project? Show this record on your own website. The label states what the record holds, links to this page and updates by itself. It is free and needs no sign-in.

Content

Facts

Automatic: the three strongest facts of this project’s own record (its last audit and two more), highlighted. They update with the record. Picking a fact turns Automatic off.

Fixed as
Language

Style

Layout
Theme
Accent
Corners

Format

Size
Date
Embed as
HTML
<head>
<script src="https://widget.trustblock.run/project-widget.min.js" defer></script>
</head>
<body>
<div
data-tb-project-widget
data-tb-project-slug="reactive-network"
></div>
</body>

Paste the code where the label should appear. It uses no API credit and updates by itself.

Something wrong on this page? A missing report, a wrong date, a finding that was fixed since. Tell us and we check it against its source.

Tell us