During auditing, we found `13` potential issues of various levels of severity: `2` high-severity, `1` medium-severity, `4` low-severity issues, `3` undetermined-severity issues, as well as `3` informational-level findings. The code looks well-structured and concise. We made `21` best practices recommendations. We highly recommend addressing the findings before going live. Disclaimer: Please be aware that Quantstamp was requested and had audited a single file: `PerlinXRewards.sol`; the whole system was not audited. ** 2020-08-07 update ** The Perlin team has received and taken care of all the findings and the best practice suggestions.
Low | Medium | High | Critical | Total | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Not fixed | 5 | 1 | - | - | 6 |
Fixed | 5 | - | 2 | - | 7 |
Total | 10 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 13 |
# | File Name |
---|---|
1 | contracts/PerlinXRewards.sol |