Hinkal Protocol - 2

QuantstampCode version: not recorded (see the report)

Quantstamp reviewed Hinkal (Hinkal Protocol - 2) on 28 Aug 2026: 14 findings, 0 critical; 9 marked fixed, 3 acknowledged, 2 open.

No open critical findings
Open the reportOpen Hinkal’s security record

Report hosted on certificate.quantstamp.com.

Trustblock does not review code.

Findings14

Statuses are the security firm’s own, from its report.

SeverityOpenAcknowledgedFixed
Critical000
High000
Medium001
Low238
LowAdmin Can Configure Security-Critical Changes without TimelockOpen

Privileged roles can replace various security-critical helper contracts without delay, potentially introducing unintended changes that apply for already in-flight transactions. 1. The `HINKAL_HELPER_MANAGER` role can replace `hinkalHelper` at will. That contract both assembles the public-input vector fed to the verifier and enforces the `calldataHash` integrity check that binds the proof to the spend data. 2. The `DEFAULT_ADMIN_ROLE` can call the `registerExternalAction()` function to replace external action addresses. 3. The `owner` can register any address as the Groth16 verifier for a proof shape using the `registerVerifiers()` function.

LowInput ValidationOpen

Improve input validation in the following locations: 1. Add a reverting 0-address check in `setHinkalHelper()`. 2. In `insertNullifiers()`, require that any slot flagged `onChainCreation` carries only zero-valued `inputNullifiers` instead of just skipping nullifier recording for `onChainCreation` slots. 3. Require `input.length == inputAmount` in the verifier wrapper.

Contracts in scope

No deployed address is recorded for this audit.

The report names a repository or files. Open the report to see its scope.

Part of Hinkal’s security record

Hinkal
Audits1 audit by 1 firmLast audit Aug 2026, by Quantstamp.
Critical findingsNo open critical findingsIn 1 report.
Open Hinkal’s security record

Security firm

Quantstamp

236 projects reviewed · 332 reports · latest Oct 2026

See Quantstamp’s audits

Something wrong on this page? A missing report, a wrong date, a finding that was fixed since. Tell us and we check it against its source.

Tell us