Abstract security record
As of 20 Oct 2026, Abstract has 2 audit reports by 1 security firm on Trustblock; the latest is by Oak Security, dated 31 Dec 2024. Those reports list no open critical findings.
Record last updated . It holds audits and findings, contracts and incidents up to Oct 2026. Trustblock does not review code.
Audits2
Newest first
| Audit | Security firm | Date | Scope | Critical findings | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Account Contract 0.26.0 audit | Security firm: Oak Security | Date: | Scope: Not recorded (see the report) | 1 critical finding, fixed | Open · GitHub |
| Abstract Module Bases, Proxy and Manager Contracts | Security firm: Oak Security | Date: | Scope: Not recorded (see the report) | No open critical findings | Open · GitHub |
Findings15
Statuses are the security firm’s own, from each report.
| Severity | Open | Acknowledged | Fixed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Critical | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| High | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Medium | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Low | 0 | 4 | 8 |
No open finding in these reports.
Contracts
No deployed address is recorded for these audits.
The reports name a repository or files. Open a report to see its scope.
Show this on your site
Is this your project? Show this record on your own website. The label states what the record holds, links to this page and updates by itself. It is free and needs no sign-in.
Content
Automatic: the three strongest facts of this project’s own record (its last audit and two more), highlighted. They update with the record. Picking a fact turns Automatic off.
Style
Format
<head><script src="https://widget.trustblock.run/project-widget.min.js" defer></script></head><body><divdata-tb-project-widgetdata-tb-project-slug="abstract"></div></body>
Paste the code where the label should appear. It uses no API credit and updates by itself.
Something wrong on this page? A missing report, a wrong date, a finding that was fixed since. Tell us and we check it against its source.
Tell us