Obol - Charon DV Protocol

Sigma PrimeCode version: not recorded (see the report)

Audit · firm’s term: security assessment

Sigma Prime reviewed Obol (Obol - Charon DV Protocol) on 1 Jun 2023: 21 findings, 2 critical; 17 marked fixed, 4 acknowledged.

2 critical findings, fixed
Open the reportOpen Obol’s security record

Report hosted on GitHub.

Trustblock does not review code.

Findings21

Statuses are the security firm’s own, from its report.

SeverityOpenAcknowledgedFixed
Critical002
High005
Medium012
Low038
CriticalFrost DKG Does Not Validate Message Source Matches the SenderFixed

The report gives no description here.

CriticalKryptology Does Not Verify The Length of CommitmentsFixed

The report gives no description here.

HighInadequate Input Parameter Checks Resulting in Slice Bounds Out-of- Range ErrorFixed

The report gives no description here.

HighInsufficient Validation of Consensus Messages Leads to PanicsFixed

The report gives no description here.

HighLack of Size Checks When Slicing ArraysFixed

The report gives no description here.

Highnil Pointer References From Protobuf MessagesFixed

The report gives no description here.

HighQBFT Consensus Allows Replay of Justification MessagesFixed

The report gives no description here.

MediumFrost Broadcast Messages Do Not Use Reliable BroadcastFixed

The report gives no description here.

MediumPanics in coinbase/kryptology Frost ProtocolFixed

The report gives no description here.

LowCreateDKG Allows the Threshold to be Larger Than the Number of OperatorsFixed

The report gives no description here.

Show 7 more
LowCreateDKG Does Not Validate the Checksum of the Withdrawal AddressesFixed

The report gives no description here.

LowDuplicate Keys Allowed in ENRFixed

The report gives no description here.

LowInsufficient Validation of Consensus Message TypesFixed

The report gives no description here.

LowMiscellaneous General CommentsFixed

The report gives no description here.

LowRLP Length in Bits Rather Than BytesFixed

The report gives no description here.

Lowsigagg Does Not Ensure t Partials Are ReceivedFixed

The report gives no description here.

Lowsigagg Does Not Verify the Reconstructed SignatureFixed

The report gives no description here.

Contracts in scope

No deployed address is recorded for this audit.

The report names a repository or files. Open the report to see its scope.

Part of Obol’s security record

Obol
Audits1 audit by 1 firmLast audit Jun 2023, by Sigma Prime.
Critical findingsNo open critical findingsIn that report, 2 critical findings were reported. Each is marked fixed by the firm that reported it.
Open Obol’s security record

Security firm

Sigma Prime

36 projects reviewed · 78 reports · latest Aug 2026

See Sigma Prime’s audits

Something wrong on this page? A missing report, a wrong date, a finding that was fixed since. Tell us and we check it against its source.

Tell us