Treehouse security review

Sigma PrimeCode version: not recorded (see the report)

Sigma Prime reviewed Treehouse (Treehouse security review) on 1 Aug 2024: 6 findings, 0 critical; 3 marked fixed, 3 acknowledged.

No open critical findings
Open the reportOpen Treehouse’s security record

Report hosted on GitHub.

Trustblock does not review code.

Findings6

Statuses are the security firm’s own, from its report.

SeverityOpenAcknowledgedFixed
Critical000
High000
Medium011
Low022

Marked Informational by the firm. Not counted as findings.

InformationalAccounting For Vault Gains Vulnerable To FrontrunningAcknowledged

The report gives no description here.

InformationalArbitrary Asset RemovalAcknowledged

The report gives no description here.

InformationalCode Quality ImprovementsAcknowledged

The report gives no description here.

InformationalFuture Liquid Staking Token AdditionsAcknowledged

The report gives no description here.

InformationalMiscellaneous General CommentsAcknowledged

The report gives no description here.

InformationalRate Providers Cannot Be ResetAcknowledged

The report gives no description here.

InformationalstETH Deposit Recording InaccuraciesAcknowledged

The report gives no description here.

Contracts in scope

No deployed address is recorded for this audit.

The report names a repository or files. Open the report to see its scope.

Part of Treehouse’s security record

Treehouse
Audits2 audits by 2 firmsLast audit Oct 2024, by Trail of Bits.
Critical findingsNo open critical findingsAcross 2 reports.
Open Treehouse’s security record

Security firm

Sigma Prime

15 projects reviewed · 36 reports · latest Aug 2026

See Sigma Prime’s audits

Something wrong on this page? A missing report, a wrong date, a finding that was fixed since. Tell us and we check it against its source.

Tell us