Trader AI
Audit · firm’s term: audit report
Cyberscope reviewed Trader AI on 6 Mar 2023: 7 findings, 0 critical; none marked fixed.
No open critical findings
Open the reportOpen Trader AI’s security record
Report stored on IPFS. Content hash bafkreiexj3ykm524edxmhc55xycbjhky4rxwmkxzhofjrujj7pnhapixy4
Trustblock does not review code.
Findings7
Statuses are the security firm’s own, from its report.
| Severity | Open | Acknowledged | Fixed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Critical | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| High | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Medium | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Low | 7 | 0 | 0 |
LowL02 - State Variables could be Declared ConstantOpen
The report gives no description here.
LowL04 - Conformance to Solidity Naming ConventionsOpen
The report gives no description here.
LowL07 - Missing Events ArithmeticOpen
The report gives no description here.
LowL09 - Dead Code EliminationOpen
The report gives no description here.
LowL15 - Local Scope Variable ShadowingOpen
The report gives no description here.
LowL16 - Validate Variable SettersOpen
The report gives no description here.
LowRSML - Redundant SafeMath LibraryOpen
The report gives no description here.
Contracts in scope1
| Address | Chain | Source code |
|---|---|---|
| 0x2d00c2403767c958a1429d4768bfb1612f8b7123 | Chain: BNB Chain | Source code: Verified source |
Part of Trader AI’s security record
Trader AIAudits1 audit by 1 firmLast audit Mar 2023, by Cyberscope.
Critical findingsNo open critical findingsIn 1 report.
Open Trader AI’s security recordSecurity firm
Cyberscope1,782 projects reviewed · 2,055 reports · latest Oct 2026
See Cyberscope’s auditsSomething wrong on this page? A missing report, a wrong date, a finding that was fixed since. Tell us and we check it against its source.
Tell us