UTA INU

Cyberscope22 Apr 20221 address on BNB Chain

Audit · firm’s term: audit report

Cyberscope reviewed UTA INU on 22 Apr 2022: 9 findings, 2 critical; none marked fixed.

2 open critical findings

Open the report Open UTA INU’s security record

Report stored on IPFS. Content hash bafkreig4kzmguslbeflsxlvjioii5vnefmkdihvgwcz4xlbqt44rzyeurm

Trustblock does not review code.

Findings9

Statuses are the security firm’s own, from its report.

Severity	Open	Acknowledged	Fixed
Critical	2	0	0
High	0	0	0
Medium	0	0	0
Low	7	0	0

CriticalELFM - Exceed Limit Fees ManipulationOpen

The report gives no description here.

CriticalST - Stop TransactionsOpen

The report gives no description here.

LowL01 - Public Function could be Declared ExternalOpen

The report gives no description here.

LowL04 - Conformance to Solidity Naming ConventionsOpen

The report gives no description here.

LowL07 - Missing Events ArithmeticOpen

The report gives no description here.

LowL09 - Dead Code EliminationOpen

The report gives no description here.

LowL11 - Unnecessary Boolean equalityOpen

The report gives no description here.

LowL13 - Divide before Multiply OperationOpen

The report gives no description here.

LowL15 - Local Scope Variable ShadowingOpen

The report gives no description here.

Contracts in scope1

Address	Chain	Source code
0x64600d9c8df1ab026e0a90bcf04dc22ca9b7da36	Chain: BNB Chain	Source code: Verified source

Part of UTA INU’s security record

UTA INU

Audits1 audit by 1 firmLast audit Apr 2022, by Cyberscope.

Critical findings2 open critical findingsReported in “UTA INU” by Cyberscope, Apr 2022. Not marked fixed in that report.

Open UTA INU’s security record

Security firm

Cyberscope

1,783 projects reviewed · 2,056 reports · latest Oct 2026

See Cyberscope’s audits

Something wrong on this page? A missing report, a wrong date, a finding that was fixed since. Tell us and we check it against its source.