Illuvium Staking V3 Audit Report

CyfrinCode version: not recorded (see the report)

Audit · firm’s term: audit report

Cyfrin reviewed Illuvium (Illuvium Staking V3 Audit Report) on 21 Oct 2025: 7 findings, 0 critical; 6 marked fixed, 1 acknowledged.

No open critical findings
Open the reportOpen Illuvium’s security record

Report hosted on GitHub.

Trustblock does not review code.

Findings7

Statuses are the security firm’s own, from its report.

SeverityOpenAcknowledgedFixed
Critical000
High000
Medium000
Low016

Marked Informational or Gas by the firm. Not counted as findings.

InformationalConsider adding a minimum deposit amount in StakingVaultFixed

The report gives no description here.

InformationalInconsistent recipient handling for claimable poolsFixed

The report gives no description here.

InformationalLack of events emitted for important state changesFixed

The report gives no description here.

InformationalLack of validation of Pool.underlyingToken == Staking- Vault.stakingAssetFixed

The report gives no description here.

InformationalMissing address(0) check in setDistributorFixed

The report gives no description here.

InformationalMissing sanity check for reasonable duration valuesFixed

The report gives no description here.

InformationalRedundant recomputation of accrued rewards in StakingVault::_updateRewardsFixed

The report gives no description here.

GasUnoptimised overflow check in _assertFixedBpsCapFixed

The report gives no description here.

InformationalUnused factory storage in L2RevenueDistributorV3Fixed

The report gives no description here.

Contracts in scope

No deployed address is recorded for this audit.

The report names a repository or files. Open the report to see its scope.

Part of Illuvium’s security record

Illuvium
Audits6 audits by 4 firmsLast audit Oct 2025, by Cyfrin.
Critical findingsNo open critical findingsAcross 6 reports.
Open Illuvium’s security record

Security firm

Cyfrin

28 projects reviewed · 79 reports · latest Sep 2026

See Cyfrin’s audits

Something wrong on this page? A missing report, a wrong date, a finding that was fixed since. Tell us and we check it against its source.

Tell us