Neutron Independent Chain audit

Oak SecurityCode version: not recorded (see the report)

Oak Security reviewed Neutron (Neutron Independent Chain audit) on 25 Mar 2025: 35 findings, 2 critical; 26 marked fixed, 9 acknowledged.

1 critical acknowledged, not fixed
Open the reportOpen Neutron’s security record

Report hosted on GitHub.

Trustblock does not review code.

Findings35

Statuses are the security firm’s own, from its report.

SeverityOpenAcknowledgedFixed
Critical011
High039
Medium000
Low0516
CriticalValidators receive lesser rewards due to incorrect reward denomFixed

The report gives no description here.

HighBlacklist feature does not account for block height, causing incorrect vote computationFixed

The report gives no description here.

HighBypassing the embedded filesystem causes file I/O errors on non-build machines, causing a denial of serviceFixed

The report gives no description here.

HighFailure to handle BeforeDelegationRemoved hook leads to stake inconsistencyFixed

The report gives no description here.

HighFailure to update user stake may cause excess reward distributionFixed

The report gives no description here.

HighIncorrect parameter passed during SudoMsg::AfterValidatorRemovedFixed

The report gives no description here.

HighIncorrect stake retrieval for LST protocols leads to zero rewardsFixed

The report gives no description here.

HighPotential incorrect delegation logic in StakeWithDropFixed

The report gives no description here.

HighUnbounded validator iteration causes potential out-of-gas errorsFixed

The report gives no description here.

HighValidator rewards are lost if the payment schedule is updatedFixed

The report gives no description here.

Show 10 more
LowFailure to check for contract existence in hook subscriptions may result in a chain halt or denial of serviceFixed

The report gives no description here.

LowFailure to handle error from SendCoinsFromModuleToModule allows execution to continue despite transfer failureFixed

The report gives no description here.

LowInconsistent provider definition in the Staking Info Proxy contract and documentationFixed

The report gives no description here.

LowIncorrect TWAP response returned from the PaymentInfo queryFixed

The report gives no description here.

LowLack of validation for TwapWindow can lead to recent price deletionFixed

The report gives no description here.

LowMissing enforcement of validator reward eligibility based on active set statusFixed

The report gives no description here.

LowMissing genesis state validation in x/revenueFixed

The report gives no description here.

LowMissing upper bounds limits in the neutron-staking-rewards contractFixed

The report gives no description here.

LowMissing validations in the x/harpoon moduleFixed

The report gives no description here.

LowNegative prices are not handledFixed

The report gives no description here.

Show 6 more
LowNew validator accounts are not pre-funded, potentially causing upgrade failureFixed

The report gives no description here.

LowPotential overflow during block interval calculationsFixed

The report gives no description here.

LowRounding discrepancy in before_validator_slashed leads to misestimation of slashed tokensFixed

The report gives no description here.

LowSuboptimal staking parameters affect IBC reliability,Fixed

The report gives no description here.

LowThe DAO address is not blocked from claimingFixed

The report gives no description here.

LowValidator rewards are lost due to possible fund shortagesFixed

The report gives no description here.

Contracts in scope

No deployed address is recorded for this audit.

The report names a repository or files. Open the report to see its scope.

Part of Neutron’s security record

Neutron
Audits1 audit by 1 firmLast audit Mar 2025, by Oak Security.
Critical findings1 critical acknowledged, not fixedReported in “Neutron Independent Chain audit” by Oak Security, Mar 2025. The team acknowledged it.
Open Neutron’s security record

Security firm

Oak Security

33 projects reviewed · 60 reports · latest May 2026

See Oak Security’s audits

Something wrong on this page? A missing report, a wrong date, a finding that was fixed since. Tell us and we check it against its source.

Tell us