MetaCafe
Audit · firm’s term: audit report
Cyberscope reviewed MetaCafe on 23 Feb 2023: 6 findings, 0 critical; none marked fixed.
No open critical findings
Open the reportOpen MetaCafe’s security record
Report stored on IPFS. Content hash bafkreidiiwcvq5rer2gu7xilutiyrsw5ryzyx4unfuuu77yvqx5utp66eu
Trustblock does not review code.
Findings6
Statuses are the security firm’s own, from its report.
| Severity | Open | Acknowledged | Fixed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Critical | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| High | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Medium | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Low | 6 | 0 | 0 |
LowL04 - Conformance to Solidity Naming ConventionsOpen
The report gives no description here.
LowL07 - Missing Events ArithmeticOpen
The report gives no description here.
LowL12 - Using Variables before DeclarationOpen
The report gives no description here.
LowL14 - Uninitialized Variables in Local ScopeOpen
The report gives no description here.
LowL16 - Validate Variable SettersOpen
The report gives no description here.
LowL20 - Succeeded Transfer CheckOpen
The report gives no description here.
Contracts in scope1
| Address | Chain | Source code |
|---|---|---|
| 0x79dcccce92e3b309da7b44880239f9d5a21a6d8b | Chain: BNB Chain | Source code: Verified source |
Part of MetaCafe’s security record
MetaCafe
Audits2 audits by 1 firmLast audit Feb 2023, by Cyberscope.
Critical findingsNo open critical findingsAcross 2 reports.
Open MetaCafe’s security recordSecurity firm
Cyberscope1,782 projects reviewed · 2,055 reports · latest Oct 2026
See Cyberscope’s auditsSomething wrong on this page? A missing report, a wrong date, a finding that was fixed since. Tell us and we check it against its source.
Tell us