GRQ V1

QuillAuditsFiles named in the report

Audit · firm’s term: audit report

QuillAudits reviewed GRQ V1 on 4 Apr 2025: 3 findings, 0 critical; all marked fixed.

No open critical findings
Open the reportOpen GRQ V1’s security record

Report hosted on quillaudits.com.

Trustblock does not review code.

Findings3

Statuses are the security firm’s own, from its report.

SeverityOpenAcknowledgedFixed
Critical000
High001
Medium001
Low001
HighThe contract increases the global rewardsPerSecond each time a pool starts, leading to more reward distributions.Fixed

The contract increases the global rewardsPerSecond each time a pool starts, leading to more reward distributions. Each new pool adds its allocation points to rewardsPerSecond, causing the total rewards to multiply with each pool addition.<br>This could allow protocol to distribute significantly more rewards than intended.<br><br>

MediumThe governanceRecoverUnsupported function lacks a reward token check.Fixed

There is no check for the input token as rewardToken in the recover function.<strong> </strong>While protected by timelock and multisig, this still remains an issue that could allow reward tokens to be recovered, potentially affecting user rewards.

LowNo check against zero address in setOperator functionFixed

No check against zero address in setOperator function , setting operator to zero address would permanently disable the access to call the operator functions<strong> .</strong>

Contracts in scope

No deployed address is recorded for this audit.

The report names a repository or files. Open the report to see its scope.

Repository and files the report names (2)

  • ter/src/farms/GenesisRewardPool.sol
  • GenesisRewardPool.sol

Part of GRQ V1’s security record

GRQ V1
Audits1 audit by 1 firmLast audit Apr 2025, by QuillAudits.
Critical findingsNo open critical findingsIn 1 report.
Open GRQ V1’s security record

Security firm

QuillAudits

350 projects reviewed · 459 reports · latest Apr 2025

See QuillAudits’s audits

Something wrong on this page? A missing report, a wrong date, a finding that was fixed since. Tell us and we check it against its source.

Tell us