Cell.land
Audit · firm’s term: audit report
Cyberscope reviewed Cell.land on 30 Dec 2021: 3 findings, 0 critical; none marked fixed.
No open critical findings
Open the reportOpen Cell.land’s security record
Report stored on IPFS. Content hash bafkreichhqtoepd5fnktw4tzoz4el75qeicmndvtn4x4dfqkbf4srxirj4
Trustblock does not review code.
Findings3
Statuses are the security firm’s own, from its report.
| Severity | Open | Acknowledged | Fixed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Critical | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| High | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Medium | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Low | 3 | 0 | 0 |
LowL01 - Public Function could be Declared ExternalOpen
The report gives no description here.
LowL03 - Redundant StatementsOpen
The report gives no description here.
LowL09 - Dead Code EliminationOpen
The report gives no description here.
Contracts in scope1
| Address | Chain | Source code |
|---|---|---|
| 0xa202f9f2cad6bf168a669a9c48d2f24d47aa0e4a | Chain: BNB Chain | Source code: Verified source |
Part of Cell.land’s security record
Cell.land
Audits2 audits by 1 firmLast audit Dec 2021, by Cyberscope.
Critical findingsNo open critical findingsAcross 2 reports.
Open Cell.land’s security recordSecurity firm
Cyberscope1,783 projects reviewed · 2,056 reports · latest Oct 2026
See Cyberscope’s auditsSomething wrong on this page? A missing report, a wrong date, a finding that was fixed since. Tell us and we check it against its source.
Tell us