Token Mint

QuantstampFiles named in the report

Quantstamp reviewed Token Mint on 12 Dec 2019: 7 findings, 0 critical; 2 marked fixed, 1 acknowledged, 4 open.

No open critical findings
Open the reportOpen Token Mint’s security record

Report hosted on certificate.quantstamp.com.

Trustblock does not review code.

Findings7

Statuses are the security firm’s own, from its report.

SeverityOpenAcknowledgedFixed
Critical000
High000
Medium000
Low412
LowAllowance Double-Spend ExploitFixed

As it presently is constructed, the contract is vulnerable to the [allowance double-spend exploit](https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-solidity/blob/b4f87bb8fc25fb07f73099701e39e167a3d36465/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol#L71-L78), as with other ERC20 tokens. <br /><br /> **Update:** Although the functions `increaseAllowance()` and `decreaseAllowance()` were added to mitigate this issue, they were not accompanied with tests.

LowUnlocked PragmaFixed

Every Solidity file specifies in the header a version number of the format `pragma solidity (^)0.4.*`. The caret (`^`) before the version number implies an unlocked pragma, meaning that the compiler will use the specified version _and above_, hence the term "unlocked."

Contracts in scope

No deployed address is recorded for this audit.

The report names a repository or files. Open the report to see its scope.

Repository and files the report names (6)

  • contracts/Pausable.sol
  • contracts/NGNT.sol
  • contracts/Blacklistable.sol
  • contracts/Ownable.sol
  • contracts/LimitedUpgradesProxyAdmin.sol
  • contracts/Migrations.sol

Part of Token Mint’s security record

Token Mint
Audits1 audit by 1 firmLast audit Dec 2019, by Quantstamp.
Critical findingsNo open critical findingsIn 1 report.
Open Token Mint’s security record

Security firm

Quantstamp

236 projects reviewed · 332 reports · latest Oct 2026

See Quantstamp’s audits

Something wrong on this page? A missing report, a wrong date, a finding that was fixed since. Tell us and we check it against its source.

Tell us