Fluxfire Smart Contract Review
Audit · firm’s term: smart contract audit
Zokyo reviewed Fluxfire (Fluxfire Smart Contract Review) on 5 Jun 2023: 5 findings, 0 critical; none marked fixed.
No open critical findings
Open the reportOpen Fluxfire’s security record
Report stored on IPFS. Content hash Qmez5mmGdn8YzePAsCh5BajMgazR8WGcsetpjAMbvgZdHY
Trustblock does not review code.
Findings5
Statuses are the security firm’s own, from its report.
| Severity | Open | Acknowledged | Fixed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Critical | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| High | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Medium | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Low | 4 | 0 | 0 |
MediumFunction destruct in HappyTokenPool contract does not reset pool's Packed3 struct fieldsOpen
The report gives no description here.
LowFunction claim() in HappyTokenPool, does not update pool’sOpen
The report gives no description here.
LowFunction initialize() in HappyTokenPool should be restricted to contract owner or creator.Open
The report gives no description here.
LowFunction swap() sends ether, it is recommended that you add openzeppelin’s reentrancyOpen
The report gives no description here.
LowThe code line msg.sender == pool.creator repeated in different functions inOpen
The report gives no description here.
Contracts in scope
No deployed address is recorded for this audit.
The report names a repository or files. Open the report to see its scope.
Repository and files the report names (3)
- https://github.com/fluxfirexyz/IDOFCFS//contracts/ito.sol at commit ea8cc2b8a758f78c7d0652dab25f14cfa3a963e5
- https://github.com/fluxfirexyz/IDOFCFS//contracts/qualification.sol at commit ea8cc2b8a758f78c7d0652dab25f14cfa3a963e5
- https://github.com/fluxfirexyz/IDOFCFS//contracts/IQLF.sol at commit ea8cc2b8a758f78c7d0652dab25f14cfa3a963e5
Part of Fluxfire’s security record
Fluxfire
Audits1 audit by 1 firmLast audit Jun 2023, by Zokyo.
Critical findingsNo open critical findingsIn 1 report.
Open Fluxfire’s security recordSecurity firm
Zokyo89 projects reviewed · 131 reports · latest Feb 2025
See Zokyo’s auditsSomething wrong on this page? A missing report, a wrong date, a finding that was fixed since. Tell us and we check it against its source.
Tell us