passivexrp
Audit · firm’s term: audit report
Cyberscope reviewed passivexrp on 11 Jan 2022: 7 findings, 1 critical; none marked fixed.
1 open critical finding
Open the reportOpen passivexrp’s security record
Report stored on IPFS. Content hash bafkreidy3k6ilwfohfgdaiyfpcnu5q7mriew5ot2lpfaasikrx73gukanu
Trustblock does not review code.
Findings7
Statuses are the security firm’s own, from its report.
| Severity | Open | Acknowledged | Fixed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Critical | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| High | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Medium | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Low | 5 | 0 | 0 |
CriticalELFM - Exceed Limit Fees ManipulationOpen
The report gives no description here.
MediumBC - Blacklisted ContractsOpen
The report gives no description here.
LowL01 - Public Function could be Declared ExternalOpen
The report gives no description here.
LowL04 - Conformance to Solidity Naming ConventionsOpen
The report gives no description here.
LowL05 - Unused State VariableOpen
The report gives no description here.
LowL07 - Missing Events ArithmeticOpen
The report gives no description here.
LowL09 - Dead Code EliminationOpen
The report gives no description here.
Contracts in scope1
| Address | Chain | Source code |
|---|---|---|
| 0x075fc0de2a06ccbc1f8bf1496c2a787abbd87562 | Chain: BNB Chain | Source code: Verified source. Powered by Etherscan.io APIs |
Part of passivexrp’s security record
passivexrp
Audits1 audit by 1 firmLast audit Jan 2022, by Cyberscope.
Critical findings1 open critical findingReported in “passivexrp” by Cyberscope, Jan 2022. Not marked fixed in that report.
Open passivexrp’s security recordSecurity firm
Cyberscope1,783 projects reviewed · 2,056 reports · latest Oct 2026
See Cyberscope’s auditsSomething wrong on this page? A missing report, a wrong date, a finding that was fixed since. Tell us and we check it against its source.
Tell us