Quantstamp reviewed Reach Protocol (/Reach Protocol) on 13 Nov 2023: 15 findings, 0 critical; 4 marked fixed, 7 acknowledged, 4 open.
Report hosted on certificate.quantstamp.com.
Trustblock does not review code.
Statuses are the security firm’s own, from its report.
| Severity | Open | Acknowledged | Fixed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Critical | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| High | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Medium | 3 | 2 | 1 |
| Low | 1 | 4 | 3 |
This issue is newly added during the fix-review. In the provided commit hash `8afbbf4` for the fix-review, the functions `createMission()` and `claimRewards()` were updated to accept the parameter `_paymentType`. However, `createDistribution()` was not and the check `require(address(this).balance >= _amount, "Insufficient balance.");` will reject reward tokens other than Ether.
The protocol allows for an unlimited number of admins. An admin has the power to invoke the function `createDistribution`, which changes the current `merkleRoot` and the `currentVersion` variable. This can be used to prevent users from claiming in a given round.
The owner of the contract can add/remove any number of admins. This means all the protection from the admins can be voided by a malicious owner. Once the owner itself gets hacked, everything will go down without any measure to stop it.
The docs state that there should be a `withdraw` function that allows the owner to withdraw excessive funds, however there is no function that does that.
The report names a repository or files. Open the report to see its scope.
Repository and files the report names (1)
236 projects reviewed · 332 reports · latest Oct 2026
See Quantstamp’s auditsSomething wrong on this page? A missing report, a wrong date, a finding that was fixed since. Tell us and we check it against its source.
Tell us