Sugar Yield
SolidProof reviewed SugarYield (Sugar Yield) on 21 Jan 2023: 8 findings, 0 critical; none marked fixed.
No open critical findings
Open the reportOpen SugarYield’s security record
Report stored on IPFS. Content hash QmQNyE6s8bf1yAU4fCXKePFKpp5WU42d1VD6jW4Xi136ob
Statuses are the security firm’s own, from this report. Trustblock does not review code.
Findings8
Statuses are the security firm’s own, from its report.
| Severity | Open | Acknowledged | Fixed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Critical | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| High | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Medium | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Low | 8 | 0 | 0 |
Low#1: Contract doesn’t import npm packages from source (like OpenZeppelin etc.)Not fixed
The report gives no description here.
Low#1: State variables that could be declared constant (constable-states)Not fixed
The report gives no description here.
Low#2: Functions that are not usedNot fixed
The report gives no description here.
Low#2: Missing Zero Address Validation (missing-zero-check)Not fixed
The report gives no description here.
Low#3: Missing Events ArithmeticNot fixed
The report gives no description here.
Low#3: MisspellingNot fixed
The report gives no description here.
Low#4: transferFrom missingNot fixed
The report gives no description here.
Low#4: Unused eventNot fixed
The report gives no description here.
Contracts in scope1
| Address | Chain | Source code |
|---|---|---|
| 0x57528b45134f09f2e0069334a36a7e14af74745f | Chain: BNB Chain | Source code: Verified source |
Part of SugarYield’s security record
SugarYield
Audits8 audits by 1 firmLast audit Jan 2023, by SolidProof.
Critical findingsNo open critical findingsAcross 8 reports.
Open SugarYield’s security recordSecurity firm
SolidProof1,127 projects reviewed · 1,478 reports · latest Feb 2025
See SolidProof’s auditsSomething wrong on this page? A missing report, a wrong date, a finding that was fixed since. Tell us and we check it against its source.
Tell us