Persistence security review
Hexens reviewed Persistence (Persistence security review) on 12 Jan 2024: 7 findings, 1 critical; 5 marked fixed, 2 acknowledged.
1 critical finding, fixed
Open the reportOpen Persistence’s security record
Report hosted on GitHub.
Trustblock does not review code.
Findings7
Statuses are the security firm’s own, from its report.
| Severity | Open | Acknowledged | Fixed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Critical | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| High | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Medium | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Low | 0 | 1 | 2 |
CriticalUSER CAN LOCK AND STAKE ARBITRARY AMOUNT OF TOKENS WITHOUT PAYINGFixed
The report gives no description here.
HighDIVISION BY ZERO IN SHARE CONVERSION LEADS TO PANIC AND DENIAL-OF-SERVICEFixed
The report gives no description here.
MediumUNBONDING OF VALIDATORS DOES NOT GIVE PRIORITY TO INACTIVE VALIDATORSFixed
The report gives no description here.
LowWHITELISTED VALIDATOR TARGET WEIGHT IS UNCAPPED AND UNITLESSFixed
The report gives no description here.
LowWHITELISTED VALIDATORS CANNOT BE INACTIVATEDFixed
The report gives no description here.
Contracts in scope
No deployed address is recorded for this audit.
The report names a repository or files. Open the report to see its scope.
Part of Persistence’s security record
PersistenceAudits4 audits by 2 firmsLast audit Apr 2024, by Hexens.
Critical findings2 criticals acknowledged, not fixedReported in 2 reports, the latest by Oak Security, Jan 2024. The team acknowledged both.
Open Persistence’s security recordSecurity firm
Hexens32 projects reviewed · 74 reports · latest Jul 2026
See Hexens’s auditsSomething wrong on this page? A missing report, a wrong date, a finding that was fixed since. Tell us and we check it against its source.
Tell us