Octopus Bridge / BTC Bridge Contracts
Hacken reviewed Octopus Bridge (Octopus Bridge / BTC Bridge Contracts) on 1 Jun 2024: 5 findings, 1 critical; 4 marked fixed, 1 open.
1 critical finding, fixed
Open the reportOpen Octopus Bridge’s security record
Report hosted on hacken.io.
Trustblock does not review code.
Findings5
Statuses are the security firm’s own, from its report.
| Severity | Open | Acknowledged | Fixed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Critical | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| High | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Medium | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Low | 1 | 0 | 1 |
CriticalSignature Replay AttackFixed
The report gives no description here.
MediumContracts Are Vulnerable To Fee-On-Transfer Accounting-Related IssuesFixed
The report gives no description here.
MediumUse Of `ecrecover` Is Susceptible To Signature MalleabilityFixed
The report gives no description here.
LowState Variables Only Set in The Constructor Should Be Declared `immutable`Fixed
The report gives no description here.
Contracts in scope
No deployed address is recorded for this audit.
The report names a repository or files. Open the report to see its scope.
Repository and files the report names (2)
- contracts/Bridge.sol
- contracts/libraries/Structs.sol
Part of Octopus Bridge’s security record
Octopus BridgeAudits1 audit by 1 firmLast audit Jun 2024, by Hacken.
Critical findingsNo open critical findingsIn that report, 1 critical finding was reported. It is marked fixed by the firm that reported it.
Open Octopus Bridge’s security recordSecurity firm
Hacken343 projects reviewed · 476 reports · latest Sep 2026
See Hacken’s auditsSomething wrong on this page? A missing report, a wrong date, a finding that was fixed since. Tell us and we check it against its source.
Tell us