Saffron Lido Vaults audit

SherlockCode version: not recorded (see the report)

Audit competition · firm’s term: public contest

Sherlock reviewed saffron.finance (Saffron Lido Vaults audit) on 21 Sep 2024: 5 findings, 0 critical; 4 marked fixed, 1 acknowledged.

No open critical findings
Open the reportOpen saffron.finance’s security record

Report hosted on GitHub.

Trustblock does not review code.

Findings5

Statuses are the security firm’s own, from its report.

SeverityOpenAcknowledgedFixed
Critical000
High002
Medium012
Low000
HighThe incorrect accounting of protocol fee will cause double charging fee and wrong distribution of earnings for variable usersFixed

The report gives no description here.

HightotalEarnings is incorrect when withdrawing after ending which will withdraw too many funds leaving the Vault insolventFixed

The report gives no description here.

MediumAttacker will DoS LidoVault up to 36 days which will ruin expected apr for all parties involvedFixed

The report gives no description here.

MediumLidoVault::vaultEndedWithdraw doesn't take into consideration income withdrawals before slashing, blocking variable users from withdrwing their incomeFixed

The report gives no description here.

Contracts in scope

No deployed address is recorded for this audit.

The report names a repository or files. Open the report to see its scope.

Part of saffron.finance’s security record

saffron.finance
Audits7 audits by 4 firmsLast audit Mar 2026, by Pashov Audit Group.
Critical findingsNo open critical findingsAcross the 7 reports, 3 critical findings were reported. Each is marked fixed by the firm that reported it.
Open saffron.finance’s security record

Security firm

Sherlock

46 projects reviewed · 67 reports · latest Sep 2026

See Sherlock’s audits

Something wrong on this page? A missing report, a wrong date, a finding that was fixed since. Tell us and we check it against its source.

Tell us