RedStone MultiFeed Adapter audit
ABDK Consulting reviewed RedStone (RedStone MultiFeed Adapter audit) on 8 Jan 2026: 11 findings, 0 critical; 4 marked fixed, 7 acknowledged.
Report hosted on GitHub.
Trustblock does not review code.
Findings11
Statuses are the security firm’s own, from its report.
| Severity | Open | Acknowledged | Fixed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Critical | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| High | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Medium | 0 | 2 | 1 |
| Low | 0 | 5 | 3 |
MediumIn case for some of the data feeds both adapters fail, the whole batch will be reverted and no data will be returned even for healthy data feeds.Acknowledged
The report gives no description here.
MediumPhantom overflow is possible here, i.e.Acknowledged
The report gives no description here.
LowConsider specifying as “^0.8.0” unless there is something special regarding this particular version.Acknowledged
The report gives no description here.
LowThe “mainOk” flag is checked twice.Acknowledged
The report gives no description here.
LowThe constant name is too long and contain too much details.Acknowledged
The report gives no description here.
LowThe contract name is tool long and contains too much details.Acknowledged
The report gives no description here.
LowThis code seems overcomplicated.Acknowledged
The report gives no description here.
Contracts in scope
No deployed address is recorded for this audit.
The report names a repository or files. Open the report to see its scope.
Part of RedStone’s security record
Security firm
ABDK Consulting31 projects reviewed · 64 reports · latest Jan 2026
See ABDK Consulting’s auditsSomething wrong on this page? A missing report, a wrong date, a finding that was fixed since. Tell us and we check it against its source.
Tell us