REGNUM
Audit · firm’s term: audit report
Cyberscope reviewed REGNUM on 5 Jan 2022: 6 findings, 0 critical; none marked fixed.
No open critical findings
Open the reportOpen REGNUM’s security record
Report stored on IPFS. Content hash bafkreiefyh4pnunm2664rgfkfdhid6uksxgkk5onngxwtr22we6tpyvibm
Trustblock does not review code.
Findings6
Statuses are the security firm’s own, from its report.
| Severity | Open | Acknowledged | Fixed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Critical | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| High | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Medium | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Low | 6 | 0 | 0 |
LowL01 - Public Function could be Declared ExternalOpen
The report gives no description here.
LowL02 - State Variables could be Declared ConstantOpen
The report gives no description here.
LowL04 - Conformance to Solidity Naming ConventionsOpen
The report gives no description here.
LowL07 - Missing Events ArithmeticOpen
The report gives no description here.
LowL08 - Tautology or ContradictionOpen
The report gives no description here.
LowL09 - Dead Code EliminationOpen
The report gives no description here.
Contracts in scope1
| Address | Chain | Source code |
|---|---|---|
| 0xbac75dcd76a64ba7de878ecd3aa8aad235322085 | Chain: BNB Chain | Source code: Verified source |
Part of REGNUM’s security record
REGNUMAudits1 audit by 1 firmLast audit Jan 2022, by Cyberscope.
Critical findingsNo open critical findingsIn 1 report.
Open REGNUM’s security recordSecurity firm
Cyberscope1,783 projects reviewed · 2,056 reports · latest Oct 2026
See Cyberscope’s auditsSomething wrong on this page? A missing report, a wrong date, a finding that was fixed since. Tell us and we check it against its source.
Tell us