Sensi Token / Token
Hacken reviewed Sensi (Sensi Token / Token) on 18 Dec 2024: 5 findings, 0 critical; none marked fixed.
No open critical findings
Open the reportOpen Sensi’s security record
Report hosted on hacken.io.
Trustblock does not review code.
Findings5
Statuses are the security firm’s own, from its report.
| Severity | Open | Acknowledged | Fixed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Critical | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| High | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Medium | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Low | 5 | 0 | 0 |
LowFloating PragmaOpen
The report gives no description here.
LowInconsistent Use of msg.sender and _msgSender() in A_SENSIv3 ContractOpen
The report gives no description here.
LowLack of Configuration EventsOpen
The report gives no description here.
LowMagic Numbers Usage Reduces Code ReadabilityOpen
The report gives no description here.
LowRedundant Comparisons to Boolean ValuesOpen
The report gives no description here.
Contracts in scope1
| Address | Chain | Source code |
|---|---|---|
| 0x63e77cf206801782239d4f126cfa22b517fb4edb | Chain: BNB Chain | Source code: Verified source |
Part of Sensi’s security record
SensiAudits1 audit by 1 firmLast audit Dec 2024, by Hacken.
Critical findingsNo open critical findingsIn 1 report.
Open Sensi’s security recordSecurity firm
Hacken343 projects reviewed · 476 reports · latest Sep 2026
See Hacken’s auditsSomething wrong on this page? A missing report, a wrong date, a finding that was fixed since. Tell us and we check it against its source.
Tell us