Astroport PCL Neutron Duality Orderbook Integratio

Oak SecurityCode version: not recorded (see the report)

Oak Security reviewed Astroport (Astroport PCL Neutron Duality Orderbook Integratio) on 17 Mar 2025: 10 findings, 3 critical; 9 marked fixed, 1 acknowledged.

3 critical findings, fixed
Open the reportOpen Astroport’s security record

Report hosted on GitHub.

Trustblock does not review code.

Findings10

Statuses are the security firm’s own, from its report.

SeverityOpenAcknowledgedFixed
Critical003
High011
Medium000
Low005
CriticalInconsistent parameter ordering in price conversion functionFixed

The report gives no description here.

CriticalMissing ob_state persistence causes incorrect pool repegFixed

The report gives no description here.

CriticalUpdated price state is not persisted after cumulative trade processingFixed

The report gives no description here.

HighExcessive gas consumption in pool operationsFixed

The report gives no description here.

LowInaccurate simulations due to missing cumulative trade handlingFixed

The report gives no description here.

LowInconsistent range validationFixed

The report gives no description here.

LowIncorrect percentage constants in liquidity definitionsFixed

The report gives no description here.

LowMissing empty pool validation in query_cumulative_pricesFixed

The report gives no description here.

LowMissing validation for avg_price_adjustment parameterFixed

The report gives no description here.

Contracts in scope

No deployed address is recorded for this audit.

The report names a repository or files. Open the report to see its scope.

Part of Astroport’s security record

Astroport
Audits12 audits by 1 firmLast audit Mar 2025, by Oak Security.
Critical findingsNo open critical findingsAcross the 12 reports, 8 critical findings were reported. Each is marked fixed by the firm that reported it.
Open Astroport’s security record

Security firm

Oak Security

33 projects reviewed · 60 reports · latest May 2026

See Oak Security’s audits

Something wrong on this page? A missing report, a wrong date, a finding that was fixed since. Tell us and we check it against its source.

Tell us