Zogi Labs - Bezoge

CertiKFiles named in the report

CertiK reviewed Magical Blocks (Zogi Labs - Bezoge) on 6 Dec 2022: 8 findings, 0 critical; 2 marked fixed, 5 acknowledged, 1 open.

No open critical findings
Open the reportOpen Magical Blocks’s security record

Report hosted on skynet.certik.com.

Trustblock does not review code.

Findings8

Statuses are the security firm’s own, from its report.

SeverityOpenAcknowledgedFixed
Critical000
High030
Medium021
Low101
LowUnprotected InitializerOpen

One or more logic contracts do not protect their initializers. An attacker can call the initializer and assume ownership of the logic contract, whereby she can perform privileged operations that trick unsuspecting users into believing that she is the owner of the upgradeable contract. ```solidity=13 contract ZogiBridge is PausableUpgradeable,ReentrancyGuardUpgradeable, ``` - `ZogiBridge` is an upgradeable contract that does not protect its initializer. ```solidity=33 function init(address zogiAddr, uint256 bridgeFee_, uint256 percentageDecimals_, uint256[]memory chainIds_, ``` - `init` is an unprotected initializer function. --- ```solidity=10 contract Conversion is OwnableUpgradeable,Percentage{ ``` - `Conversion` is an upgradeable contract that does not protect its initializer. ```solidity=19 function init(address bezogeToken_, address zogiToken_, uint256 minWrapAmount_, ``` - `init` is an unprotected initializer function.

Contracts in scope

No deployed address is recorded for this audit.

The report names a repository or files. Open the report to see its scope.

Repository and files the report names (3)

  • contracts/tokens/Zogi.sol
  • contracts/wrapper/Conversion.sol
  • contracts/bridge/ZogiBridge.sol

Part of Magical Blocks’s security record

Magical Blocks
Audits1 audit by 1 firmLast audit Dec 2022, by CertiK.
Critical findingsNo open critical findingsIn 1 report.
Open Magical Blocks’s security record

Security firm

CertiK

1,044 projects reviewed · 1,375 reports · latest May 2025

See CertiK’s audits

Something wrong on this page? A missing report, a wrong date, a finding that was fixed since. Tell us and we check it against its source.

Tell us