Neutral Trade - Smart Contract Assessment

HalbornCode version: not recorded (see the report)

Audit · firm’s term: security assessment

Halborn reviewed Neutral Trade (Neutral Trade - Smart Contract Assessment) on 21 Jan 2025: 4 findings, 0 critical; 2 marked fixed, 1 acknowledged, 1 open.

No open critical findings
Open the reportOpen Neutral Trade’s security record

Report hosted on halborn.com.

Trustblock does not review code.

Findings4

Statuses are the security firm’s own, from its report.

SeverityOpenAcknowledgedFixed
Critical000
High000
Medium001
Low111

Marked Informational by the firm. Not counted as findings.

InformationalArbitrage opportunity if NAV is predictedOpen

The report gives no description here.

InformationalLack of validation of new authority on multiple functionsAcknowledged

The report gives no description here.

InformationalIncorrect manager role validation in update_allocations and remove_strategyFixed

The report gives no description here.

InformationalLack of functionality to re-enable a Receiver accountFixed

The report gives no description here.

InformationalLack of global allocation BPS tracking in NTBundle programFixed

The report gives no description here.

InformationalLack of validation for allocation_bps in Receiver setupFixed

The report gives no description here.

InformationalRedundant validation of allocation_bps in distribute_to_receiversFixed

The report gives no description here.

InformationalRedundant validation of refill_amount in perform_refillFixed

The report gives no description here.

Contracts in scope

No deployed address is recorded for this audit.

The report names a repository or files. Open the report to see its scope.

Part of Neutral Trade’s security record

Neutral Trade
Audits2 audits by 2 firmsLast audit Jul 2025, by Quantstamp.
Critical findingsNo open critical findingsAcross 2 reports.
Open Neutral Trade’s security record

Security firm

Halborn

17 projects reviewed · 44 reports · latest Jul 2026

See Halborn’s audits

Something wrong on this page? A missing report, a wrong date, a finding that was fixed since. Tell us and we check it against its source.

Tell us