Datamine Network / Datamine Crypto

HackenRepository at commit 28c902f

Hacken reviewed Datamine FLUX (Datamine Network / Datamine Crypto) on 22 Jul 2026: 19 findings, 0 critical; all acknowledged, none fixed.

No open critical findings
Open the reportOpen Datamine FLUX’s security record

Report hosted on hacken.io.

Trustblock does not review code.

Findings19

Statuses are the security firm’s own, from its report.

SeverityOpenAcknowledgedFixed
Critical000
High020
Medium030
Low0140
HighUnbounded burnToAddress Credit Inflates globalRatio, Enabling Sustained Reward DenialAcknowledged

The report gives no description here.

HighUnprotected sweep Enables Atomic Sandwich Extraction of Protocol LOCKAcknowledged

The report gives no description here.

MediumEmission Schedule Miscalibrated for Arbitrum Block CadenceAcknowledged

The report gives no description here.

MediumReception-Ack Requirement Strands Bridge Deposits and Locked Principal for Contract RecipientsAcknowledged

The report gives no description here.

MediumReward Multipliers Read at Mint Time Are Applied Retroactively to the Whole WindowAcknowledged

The report gives no description here.

LowDelegated Minter in mintToAddress Redirects Accrued RewardsAcknowledged

The report gives no description here.

LowIncomplete Same-Block Guard in unlock Allows Immediate RelockAcknowledged

The report gives no description here.

LowInconsistent, Floating, and Outdated Pragma Versions Reduce Code Quality and PortabilityAcknowledged

The report gives no description here.

LowIncorrect Token Reference in Code Comment Reduces Code ClarityAcknowledged

The report gives no description here.

LowInteger Division Truncation in getMintAmount Results in Zero Rewards for Small Lock AmountsAcknowledged

The report gives no description here.

Show 9 more
LowLockquidityVault init Function Lacks Access ControlAcknowledged

The report gives no description here.

LowMisleading burnToAddress Function Transfers Tokens to Vault Instead of BurningAcknowledged

The report gives no description here.

LowMisleading NatSpec Comment on _percentBurnMultiplier ConstantAcknowledged

The report gives no description here.

LowMisleading Variable Name damBalance in View FunctionsAcknowledged

The report gives no description here.

LowMissing SafeMath in LockquidityVault Arithmetic OperationsAcknowledged

The report gives no description here.

LowRedundant Array Allocation in _swap FunctionAcknowledged

The report gives no description here.

LowSilent No-Op in preventRecursion Modifier Results in Undetected Failed TransactionsAcknowledged

The report gives no description here.

LowState Variables in Flux Contract Should Be Declared ImmutableAcknowledged

The report gives no description here.

LowVestigial ALREADY_INIT Guard Is Always True in ConstructorAcknowledged

The report gives no description here.

Contracts in scope

No deployed address is recorded for this audit.

The report names a repository or files. Open the report to see its scope.

Repository and files the report names (6)

  • https://github.com/Datamine-Crypto/white-paper/audits/hacken/arbiFlux.sol at commit 28c902ff56b1126228ec8dcbb5e244b9b6729842
  • https://github.com/Datamine-Crypto/white-paper/contracts/arbiFlux.sol at commit 28c902ff56b1126228ec8dcbb5e244b9b6729842
  • https://github.com/Datamine-Crypto/white-paper/contracts/fluxL2.sol at commit 28c902ff56b1126228ec8dcbb5e244b9b6729842
  • https://github.com/Datamine-Crypto/white-paper/contracts/lockquidity.sol at commit 28c902ff56b1126228ec8dcbb5e244b9b6729842
  • https://github.com/Datamine-Crypto/white-paper/audits/hacken/lockquidity.sol at commit 28c902ff56b1126228ec8dcbb5e244b9b6729842
  • https://github.com/Datamine-Crypto/white-paper/audits/hacken/fluxL2.sol at commit 28c902ff56b1126228ec8dcbb5e244b9b6729842

Part of Datamine FLUX’s security record

Datamine FLUX
Audits1 audit by 1 firmLast audit Jul 2026, by Hacken.
Critical findingsNo open critical findingsIn 1 report.
Open Datamine FLUX’s security record

Security firm

Hacken

343 projects reviewed · 476 reports · latest Sep 2026

See Hacken’s audits

Something wrong on this page? A missing report, a wrong date, a finding that was fixed since. Tell us and we check it against its source.

Tell us