Ostium security assessment
Zellic reviewed Ostium (Ostium security assessment) on 22 Feb 2024: 17 findings, 2 critical; 12 marked fixed, 5 acknowledged.
2 critical findings, fixed
Open the reportOpen Ostium’s security record
Report hosted on GitHub.
Trustblock does not review code.
Findings17
Statuses are the security firm’s own, from its report.
| Severity | Open | Acknowledged | Fixed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Critical | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| High | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Medium | 0 | 1 | 5 |
| Low | 0 | 3 | 3 |
HighVault PNL per token is only scaled if negativeAcknowledged
The report gives no description here.
MediumCentralization risk of trusted ownerAcknowledged
The report gives no description here.
LowLocked deposit discount should be accounted at lock timeAcknowledged
The report gives no description here.
LowNo penalty for missed withdrawals from OstiumVaultAcknowledged
The report gives no description here.
LowTrade closing can revert in sendAssetsAcknowledged
The report gives no description here.
Contracts in scope
No deployed address is recorded for this audit.
The report names a repository or files. Open the report to see its scope.
Part of Ostium’s security record
OstiumAudits5 audits by 2 firmsLast audit Sep 2025, by Pashov Audit Group.
Critical findingsNo open critical findingsAcross the 5 reports, 2 critical findings were reported. Each is marked fixed by the firm that reported it.
Open Ostium’s security recordSecurity firm
Zellic28 projects reviewed · 31 reports · latest Apr 2026
See Zellic’s auditsSomething wrong on this page? A missing report, a wrong date, a finding that was fixed since. Tell us and we check it against its source.
Tell us