CertiK reviewed MAGA VP (Maga VP - audit 1) on 30 Apr 2024: 16 findings, 0 critical; 2 marked fixed, 14 open.
The original report was removed from its address (seen 17 Oct 2026).
Trustblock does not review code.
Statuses are the security firm’s own, from its report.
| Severity | Open | Acknowledged | Fixed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Critical | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| High | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Medium | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Low | 13 | 0 | 0 |
In the contract `MAGAVPDividendTracker` the role `_owner` has authority over the functions shown in the diagram below. Any compromise to the `_owner` account may allow the hacker to take advantage of this authority.  In the contract `MAGAVP` the role `_owner` has authority over the functions shown in the diagram below. Any compromise to the `_owner` account may allow the hacker to take advantage of this authority.  In the contract `Ownable` the role `_owner` has authority over the functions shown in the diagram below. Any compromise to the `_owner` account may allow the hacker to take advantage of this authority. 
In the contract `MAGAVPDividendTracker`, the role `owner` has the authority to update the token balance of an arbitrary account without community consensus. ```sol=904 function _setBalance(address account, uint256 newBalance) internal { uint256 currentBalance = balanceOf(account); if (newBalance > currentBalance) { uint256 mintAmount = newBalance.sub(currentBalance); _mint(account, mintAmount); } else if (newBalance < currentBalance) { uint256 burnAmount = currentBalance.sub(newBalance); _burn(account, burnAmount); } } ``` Any compromise to the `owner` account may allow a hacker to take advantage of this authority and manipulate users' balances. For example, the hacker could also update his/her balance to a large number, sell these tokens, and cause the token price to drop, etc.
| Address | Chain | Source code |
|---|---|---|
| 0x766d…5b2a0x766d2fcece1e3eef32aae8711ab886ee95fd5b2a | Chain: Ethereum | Source code: Verified source |
1,044 projects reviewed · 1,375 reports · latest May 2025
See CertiK’s auditsSomething wrong on this page? A missing report, a wrong date, a finding that was fixed since. Tell us and we check it against its source.
Tell us