Jito Tip Router
Audit · firm’s term: security assessment
Certora reviewed Jito (Jito Tip Router) on 13 Jan 2025: 14 findings, 6 critical; 9 marked fixed, 1 acknowledged, 4 open.
Findings14
Statuses are the security firm’s own, from its report.
| Severity | Open | Acknowledged | Fixed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Critical | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| High | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Medium | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Low | 4 | 0 | 1 |
CriticalBallot Box can be DoS-ed by filling it up with fake ballotsFixed
The report gives no description here.
CriticalBallot’s weight for previous vote doesn’t decrement on vote change, allowing attackerFixed
The report gives no description here.
CriticalReward distribution might be skipped to some operators during routingFixed
The report gives no description here.
CriticalSnapshot can be created for future epochs, assigning wrong stake weightsFixed
The report gives no description here.
CriticalSnapshotting can’t be completed if empty vault-operator delegations existFixed
The report gives no description here.
CriticalVoting can be done after routing started, leading to a DoS for the routerFixed
The report gives no description here.
HighBase router resumes with wrong rewards, distributing low amounts for operatorsFixed
The report gives no description here.
Mediumrestaking_config isn’t verified, allowing to supply a fake accountFixed
The report gives no description here.
LowRouter does one less iteration than it shouldFixed
The report gives no description here.
Contracts in scope
No deployed address is recorded for this audit.
The report names a repository or files. Open the report to see its scope.
Part of Jito’s security record
JitoSecurity firm
Certora20 projects reviewed · 46 reports · latest Aug 2026
See Certora’s auditsSomething wrong on this page? A missing report, a wrong date, a finding that was fixed since. Tell us and we check it against its source.
Tell us