Suterusu audit

PeckShield1 Mar 2021Code version: not recorded (see the report)

Audit · firm’s term: smart contract audit

PeckShield reviewed Suterusu (Suterusu audit) on 1 Mar 2021: 5 findings, 0 critical; all acknowledged, none fixed.

No open critical findings

Open the report Open Suterusu’s security record

Report hosted on GitHub.

Trustblock does not review code.

Findings5

Statuses are the security firm’s own, from its report.

Severity	Open	Acknowledged	Fixed
Critical	0	0	0
High	0	0	0
Medium	0	1	0
Low	0	4	0

MediumTrust Issue of Admin KeysAcknowledged

The report gives no description here.

LowImproved Ether TransfersAcknowledged

The report gives no description here.

LowImproved Sanity Checks For System ParametersAcknowledged

The report gives no description here.

LowPossible Front-Running For Nonce InvalidationAcknowledged

The report gives no description here.

LowSupport Of Chain-Specific User RegistrationAcknowledged

The report gives no description here.

Contracts in scope

No deployed address is recorded for this audit.

The report names a repository or files. Open the report to see its scope.

Part of Suterusu’s security record

Suterusu

Audits1 audit by 1 firmLast audit Mar 2021, by PeckShield.

Critical findingsNo open critical findingsIn 1 report.

Open Suterusu’s security record

Security firm

PeckShield

181 projects reviewed · 247 reports · latest Apr 2026

See PeckShield’s audits

Something wrong on this page? A missing report, a wrong date, a finding that was fixed since. Tell us and we check it against its source.