RingFi
Audit · firm’s term: audit report
Cyberscope reviewed RingFi on 10 Mar 2022: 8 findings, 0 critical; none marked fixed.
No open critical findings
Open the reportOpen RingFi’s security record
Report stored on IPFS. Content hash bafkreigzbkgcu2k7ktsr4qfrnmqjymyebhsqyj4fzvrktruunirgwqdyvm
Trustblock does not review code.
Findings8
Statuses are the security firm’s own, from its report.
| Severity | Open | Acknowledged | Fixed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Critical | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| High | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Medium | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Low | 7 | 0 | 0 |
MediumBC - Blacklisted ContractsOpen
The report gives no description here.
LowL01 - Public Function could be Declared ExternalOpen
The report gives no description here.
LowL02 - State Variables could be Declared ConstantOpen
The report gives no description here.
LowL04 - Conformance to Solidity Naming ConventionsOpen
The report gives no description here.
LowL05 - Unused State VariableOpen
The report gives no description here.
LowL09 - Dead Code EliminationOpen
The report gives no description here.
LowL13 - Divide before Multiply OperationOpen
The report gives no description here.
LowMTS - Manipulate Total SupplyOpen
The report gives no description here.
Contracts in scope1
| Address | Chain | Source code |
|---|---|---|
| 0x021988d2c89b1a9ff56641b2f247942358ff05c9 | Chain: BNB Chain | Source code: Verified source |
Part of RingFi’s security record
RingFiAudits2 audits by 1 firmLast audit Mar 2022, by Cyberscope.
Critical findingsNo open critical findingsAcross 2 reports.
Open RingFi’s security recordSecurity firm
Cyberscope1,783 projects reviewed · 2,056 reports · latest Oct 2026
See Cyberscope’s auditsSomething wrong on this page? A missing report, a wrong date, a finding that was fixed since. Tell us and we check it against its source.
Tell us