Amasa / DEX
Hacken reviewed Amasa (Amasa / DEX) on 19 Sep 2024: 12 findings, 0 critical; 8 marked fixed, 4 open.
Report hosted on hacken.io.
Trustblock does not review code.
Findings12
Statuses are the security firm’s own, from its report.
| Severity | Open | Acknowledged | Fixed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Critical | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| High | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Medium | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Low | 4 | 0 | 7 |
HighExposure of Private Keys and API Keys in Hardhat Configuration FileFixed
The report gives no description here.
LowBest Practices ViolationFixed
The report gives no description here.
LowLack of Explicit Visibility Modifiers for State VariablesFixed
The report gives no description here.
LowLack of Fee Validation in ConstructorFixed
The report gives no description here.
LowLack of Reentrancy Protection in depositMany FunctionFixed
The report gives no description here.
LowLack of Validation for swapData Function Selector and SwapDescription FlagsFixed
The report gives no description here.
LowUnused Error Definitions in IAmasa.sol InterfaceFixed
The report gives no description here.
LowUse of Generic uint Type Instead of Explicitly Sized Integer Types (e.g. uint256)Fixed
The report gives no description here.
Contracts in scope
No deployed address is recorded for this audit.
The report names a repository or files. Open the report to see its scope.
Repository and files the report names (2)
- contracts/interfaces/IAmasa.sol
- contracts/Amasa.sol
Part of Amasa’s security record
AmasaSecurity firm
Hacken343 projects reviewed · 476 reports · latest Sep 2026
See Hacken’s auditsSomething wrong on this page? A missing report, a wrong date, a finding that was fixed since. Tell us and we check it against its source.
Tell us