Floppa

CertiKCode version: not recorded (see the report)

CertiK reviewed Floppa on 22 May 2023: 4 findings, 0 critical; all acknowledged, none fixed.

No open critical findings
Open the reportOpen Floppa’s security record

Report hosted on skynet.certik.com.

Trustblock does not review code.

Findings4

Statuses are the security firm’s own, from its report.

SeverityOpenAcknowledgedFixed
Critical000
High010
Medium010
Low020
HighInitial Token DistributionAcknowledged

All **FLOP** tokens are sent to the contract deployer when deploying the contract. This is a potential centralization risk as the deployer can distribute **FLOP** tokens without the consensus of the community.

MediumCentralization Risks in BigFloppaToken.solAcknowledged

In the contract `BigFloppaToken` the role `_owner` has authority over the functions shown in the diagram and list below. Any compromise to the `_owner` account may allow the hacker to take advantage of this authority and control the token transfers. ![](https://accelerator-tasks-prod.acc.corp.certik.com/2a9cdbb8f6e746fcb770ecff97180fd3/diagrams/centralization_BigFloppaToken-BigFloppaToken-_owner.svg) - `blacklist()`: Owner can blacklist addresses from transferring tokens. - `setRules()`: Owner can set configurations of the contract. In the contract `Ownable` the role `_owner` has authority over the functions shown in the diagram and list below. Any compromise to the `_owner` account may allow the hacker to take advantage of this authority and transfer ownership to other addresses. ![](https://accelerator-tasks-prod.acc.corp.certik.com/2a9cdbb8f6e746fcb770ecff97180fd3/diagrams/centralization_BigFloppaToken-Ownable-_owner.svg) - `transferOwnership()`: Owner can transfer contract ownership. - `renounceOwnership()`: Owner can give up contract ownership.

LowMinimum Holding Rules for BigFloppaToken.solAcknowledged

The condition `super.balanceOf(to) + amount >= minHoldingAmount` in the `_beforeTokenTransfer` function enforces a minimum holding requirement for any address receiving tokens from the Uniswap pair. From the way this condition is written, it would require that the balance of tokens in the recipient's (`to`) address after the transfer is at least the `minHoldingAmount`. This means that a recipient must either already have enough tokens to meet the `minHoldingAmount` or the amount they are receiving should be enough to take their balance to the `minHoldingAmount` or above.

LowMissing checks for input parametersAcknowledged

The following areas are missing checks on input parameters to ensure that the inputs are appropriate. ### blacklist() * `_isBlacklisting` - No checks that the value contained in `blacklists[_address]` is not equal to the value of `_isBlacklisting` before setting a new value to `blacklists[_address]` ### setRule() * `_minHoldingAmount` - No checks to ensure that `_minHoldingAmount` is less than `_maxHoldingAmount`

Contracts in scope

No deployed address is recorded for this audit.

The report names a repository or files. Open the report to see its scope.

Part of Floppa’s security record

Floppa
Audits2 audits by 2 firmsLast audit May 2023, by Cyberscope.
Critical findingsNo open critical findingsAcross 2 reports.
Open Floppa’s security record

Security firm

CertiK

1,044 projects reviewed · 1,375 reports · latest May 2025

See CertiK’s audits

Something wrong on this page? A missing report, a wrong date, a finding that was fixed since. Tell us and we check it against its source.

Tell us