Compound Polygon Bridge Receiver Audit

OpenZeppelinFiles named in the report

Audit · firm’s term: audit

OpenZeppelin reviewed Compound (Compound Polygon Bridge Receiver Audit) on 17 Feb 2023: 9 findings, 0 critical; 4 marked fixed, 5 acknowledged.

No open critical findings
Open the reportOpen Compound’s security record

Report hosted on blog.openzeppelin.com.

Trustblock does not review code.

Findings9

Statuses are the security firm’s own, from its report.

SeverityOpenAcknowledgedFixed
Critical000
High000
Medium011
Low043
MediumProposals cannot be canceledAcknowledged

The report gives no description here.

LowIdentical transactions can be executed inside the same proposalAcknowledged

The report gives no description here.

LowMissing distinction between queued and ready-to-execute stateAcknowledged

The report gives no description here.

LowReversions in Polygon will not be seen in EthereumAcknowledged

The report gives no description here.

LowUnused return value from executeTransactionAcknowledged

The report gives no description here.

Contracts in scope

No deployed address is recorded for this audit.

The report names a repository or files. Open the report to see its scope.

Repository and files the report names (5)

  • contracts/vendor/Timelock.sol
  • contracts/ITimelock.sol
  • contracts/bridges/BaseBridgeReceiver.sol
  • contracts/bridges/polygon/PolygonBridgeReceiver.sol
  • contracts/bridges/vendor/fx-portal/contracts/FxChild.sol

Part of Compound’s security record

Compound
Audits21 audits by 4 firmsLast audit Jul 2026, by ChainSecurity.
Critical findings1 open critical findingReported in “Compound Comprehensive Protocol Audit” by OpenZeppelin, Mar 2022. Not marked fixed in that report.
IncidentIncident 29 Sep 2021Source: De.Fi incident database.
Open Compound’s security record

Security firm

OpenZeppelin

67 projects reviewed · 184 reports · latest Aug 2026

See OpenZeppelin’s audits

Something wrong on this page? A missing report, a wrong date, a finding that was fixed since. Tell us and we check it against its source.

Tell us