CertiK reviewed Rangers Protocol (Rangers Protocol III) on 16 Oct 2023: 8 findings, 0 critical; 3 marked fixed, 5 acknowledged.
Report hosted on skynet.certik.com.
Trustblock does not review code.
Statuses are the security firm’s own, from its report.
| Severity | Open | Acknowledged | Fixed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Critical | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| High | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Medium | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Low | 0 | 4 | 2 |
The function `transfer()` in the contract `RPG.sol` added limit for the sender account and receipt account. However, the function `transferFrom()` has no similar limit.
The return address of the `counterToken` function in the `UsingLiquidityProtectionService` contract is the address of the `WETH` contract in Ethereum. Although the sub-contract has rewritten the function to return the BUSD contract address, but if the sub-contract does not rewrite the `counterToken` function, the `counterToken` function may have unexpected errors.
The compiler version utilized throughout the project uses the `^` prefix specifier, denoting that a compiler version that is greater than the version will be used to compile the contracts. It is recommend the compiler version should be consistent throughout the codebase.
| Address | Chain | Source code |
|---|---|---|
| 0x1f16…c1030x1f16d41f9b3db03b462bdd6c92245ee708d1c103 | Chain: Ethereum | Source code: Verified source |
1,044 projects reviewed · 1,375 reports · latest May 2025
See CertiK’s auditsSomething wrong on this page? A missing report, a wrong date, a finding that was fixed since. Tell us and we check it against its source.
Tell us