Vana Dlp Incentives security review

Nethermind Security22 May 2025Code version: not recorded (see the report)

Audit · firm’s term: security review

Nethermind Security reviewed Vana (Vana Dlp Incentives security review) on 22 May 2025: 2 findings, 0 critical; none marked fixed.

No open critical findings

Open the report Open Vana’s security record

Report hosted on GitHub.

Trustblock does not review code.

Findings2

Statuses are the security firm’s own, from its report.

Severity	Open	Acknowledged	Fixed
Critical	0	0	0
High	0	0	0
Medium	0	0	0
Low	2	0	0

Marked Info or Best Practices by the firm. Not counted as findings.

InfoDAT tokens have inconsistent maximum suppliesOpen

The report gives no description here.

InfoDLP eligibility is updated and managed inconsistentlyOpen

The report gives no description here.

Best PracticesIVanaEpoch interface is missing functionsOpen

The report gives no description here.

InfoPrevious epoch final check in _setDlpEligibility may failOpen

The report gives no description here.

InfoToken factory maxCapDefault may revert token deploymentsOpen

The report gives no description here.

InfoUnnecessary role admin assignmentsOpen

The report gives no description here.

Best PracticesUnused codeOpen

The report gives no description here.

Contracts in scope

No deployed address is recorded for this audit.

The report names a repository or files. Open the report to see its scope.

Part of Vana’s security record

Vana

Audits3 audits by 1 firmLast audit May 2025, by Nethermind Security.

Critical findingsNo open critical findingsAcross the 3 reports, 5 critical findings were reported. Each is marked fixed by the firm that reported it.

Open Vana’s security record

Security firm

Nethermind Security

57 projects reviewed · 81 reports · latest Sep 2026

See Nethermind Security’s audits

Something wrong on this page? A missing report, a wrong date, a finding that was fixed since. Tell us and we check it against its source.