Pararium(XRM token)

CertiKCode version: not recorded (see the report)

CertiK reviewed Finger Run (Pararium(XRM token)) on 6 May 2024: 2 findings, 0 critical; all acknowledged, none fixed.

No open critical findings
Open the reportOpen Finger Run’s security record

Report hosted on skynet.certik.com.

Trustblock does not review code.

Findings2

Statuses are the security firm’s own, from its report.

SeverityOpenAcknowledgedFixed
Critical000
High010
Medium010
Low000
HighInitial Token DistributionAcknowledged

Based on the on-chain analysis, the initially minted 2000000000000000000 XRM token has been transferred to the token account CW746gj7XNLn9Vn2ZnFsisX8MnmH3k1nGqjaCj8ceT5S(owner: 4NQFTCtbsMj3PtbbvrjtwdWCsw4nPiorjbkcHDE8PE2p) in the transaction [66kC7J89BXkqAKLfmkN8Bvy35pdhyc6QhSGfghGMe6DjH25b6momFbUJdSNK13m4T9HzrZLHhkkhzyQWn7woFLVq](https://explorer.solana.com/tx/66kC7J89BXkqAKLfmkN8Bvy35pdhyc6QhSGfghGMe6DjH25b6momFbUJdSNK13m4T9HzrZLHhkkhzyQWn7woFLVq). The detailed token distribution can be found [on-chain](https://solscan.io/token/J7GG6keoAFedR5asG9HmymYUY1NVhi1WpiKJWFevkNze#holders) This could be a centralization risk as those accounts can distribute tokens without obtaining the consensus of the community. Any compromise to those accounts that hold undistributed tokens may allow the attacker to steal and sell tokens on the market, resulting in severe damage to the project.

MediumCentralization Related RisksAcknowledged

According to the on-chain data, the following authority involved with XRM token: - The freeze authority is a control mechanism within some token ecosystems that allows the designated authority to prevent specific accounts from transferring tokens. Based on the on-chain analysis, the freeze authority is [4NQFTCtbsMj3PtbbvrjtwdWCsw4nPiorjbkcHDE8PE2p](https://explorer.solana.com/address/4NQFTCtbsMj3PtbbvrjtwdWCsw4nPiorjbkcHDE8PE2p) - The metadata update authority for the XRM Token is centralized to a single account [4NQFTCtbsMj3PtbbvrjtwdWCsw4nPiorjbkcHDE8PE2p]((https://explorer.solana.com/address/4NQFTCtbsMj3PtbbvrjtwdWCsw4nPiorjbkcHDE8PE2p)). This centralization poses a risk as the authority to update token metadata is held by a singular entity, potentially leading to unilateral decisions without community consensus.

Contracts in scope

No deployed address is recorded for this audit.

The report names a repository or files. Open the report to see its scope.

Part of Finger Run’s security record

Finger Run
Audits1 audit by 1 firmLast audit May 2024, by CertiK.
Critical findingsNo open critical findingsIn 1 report.
Open Finger Run’s security record

Security firm

CertiK

1,044 projects reviewed · 1,375 reports · latest May 2025

See CertiK’s audits

Something wrong on this page? A missing report, a wrong date, a finding that was fixed since. Tell us and we check it against its source.

Tell us