Quantstamp reviewed Ajna Finance (Governance) on 4 May 2023: 13 findings, 0 critical; 11 marked fixed, 2 acknowledged.
Report hosted on certificate.quantstamp.com.
Trustblock does not review code.
Statuses are the security firm’s own, from its report.
| Severity | Open | Acknowledged | Fixed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Critical | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| High | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Medium | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Low | 0 | 2 | 8 |
Gas usage is a significant concern for smart contract developers and users, since high gas costs may deter users using the smart contract. Even worse, some gas usage issues may prevent the contract from providing services entirely. For example, if a loop requires too much gas to finish processing, then it may entirely prevent the contract from functioning correctly. When new proposals are submitted via either `proposeExtraordinary()` or `proposeStandard()` arrays of actions are passed in as parameters for that proposal. It is possible that the arrays will be too large and the transaction will run out of gas. This will only be known when the proposals pass/win the voting and contract attempts to execute them.
A greedy contract is a contract that can receive assets that can never be redeemed. In this case (as in many other smart contracts) if a user transfers ERC20 tokens directly to any of the Ajna Governance contract addresses, the tokens will not be accounted for and will be blocked in the smart contract.
The report names a repository or files. Open the report to see its scope.
Repository and files the report names (11)
236 projects reviewed · 332 reports · latest Oct 2026
See Quantstamp’s auditsSomething wrong on this page? A missing report, a wrong date, a finding that was fixed since. Tell us and we check it against its source.
Tell us