Quantstamp reviewed Zora on 17 Dec 2020: 12 findings, 0 critical; 4 marked fixed, 3 acknowledged, 5 open.
Report hosted on certificate.quantstamp.com.
Trustblock does not review code.
Statuses are the security firm’s own, from its report.
| Severity | Open | Acknowledged | Fixed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Critical | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| High | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Medium | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Low | 3 | 2 | 3 |
The Zora team is already aware that sell-on fees can be (mostly) avoided and recommends accepting bids only from reputable buyers because of this. The problem giving rise to this issue is that asks are immediately processed when a bidder makes a suitable bid. Since anyone can make the bid, asks with a high sell-on fee can be accepted by non-reputable parties. **Update 2021-01-06:** The issue was fixed by removing sell-on fees from asks.
Line 159 should have a strict inequality instead.
The `mint` function has a different set of parameters.
Using untrusted ERC20 tokens opens up re-entrancy possibilities. Although we have not been able to identify a precise exploit, the logic in contracts `Market` and `Media` is complex enough to prevent us from having complete confidence these do not exist.
The report names a repository or files. Open the report to see its scope.
Repository and files the report names (8)
236 projects reviewed · 332 reports · latest Oct 2026
See Quantstamp’s auditsSomething wrong on this page? A missing report, a wrong date, a finding that was fixed since. Tell us and we check it against its source.
Tell us