Open Meta City

CertiK1 address on Ethereum

CertiK reviewed Open Meta City on 5 Dec 2023: 2 findings, 0 critical; none marked fixed.

No open critical findings
Open the reportOpen Open Meta City’s security record

Report hosted on skynet.certik.com.

Trustblock does not review code.

Findings2

Statuses are the security firm’s own, from its report.

SeverityOpenAcknowledgedFixed
Critical000
High200
Medium000
Low000
HighCentralization Risks in OMZ.solOpen

In the contract `OpenMetaCity` the role `_owner` has authority over the functions shown in the diagram below. ![](https://accelerator-tasks-prod.acc.corp.certik.com/11ee-8b11-043a0440-b18f-bfabb12c2880/diagrams/centralization_OMZ-OpenMetaCity-_owner.svg) Any compromise to the `_owner` account may allow the hacker to take advantage of this authority and allow/prevent external user access to sensitive functionalities controlled by the `whenNotPaused` modifier.

HighInitial Token DistributionOpen

All of the `OMZ` tokens are sent to the contract deployer or one or several externally-owned account (EOA) addresses. This is a centralization risk because the deployer or the owner(s) of the EOAs can distribute tokens without obtaining the consensus of the community. Any compromise to these addresses may allow a hacker to steal and sell tokens on the market, resulting in severe damage to the project.

Contracts in scope1

AddressChainSource code
0xd7d9babf56a66daff2ac5dc96f7e886c05124676Chain: EthereumSource code: Verified source

Part of Open Meta City’s security record

Open Meta City
Audits1 audit by 1 firmLast audit Dec 2023, by CertiK.
Critical findingsNo open critical findingsIn 1 report.
Open Open Meta City’s security record

Security firm

CertiK

1,044 projects reviewed · 1,375 reports · latest May 2025

See CertiK’s audits

Something wrong on this page? A missing report, a wrong date, a finding that was fixed since. Tell us and we check it against its source.

Tell us