CertiK reviewed Open Meta City on 5 Dec 2023: 2 findings, 0 critical; none marked fixed.
Report hosted on skynet.certik.com.
Trustblock does not review code.
Statuses are the security firm’s own, from its report.
| Severity | Open | Acknowledged | Fixed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Critical | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| High | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Medium | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Low | 0 | 0 | 0 |
In the contract `OpenMetaCity` the role `_owner` has authority over the functions shown in the diagram below.  Any compromise to the `_owner` account may allow the hacker to take advantage of this authority and allow/prevent external user access to sensitive functionalities controlled by the `whenNotPaused` modifier.
All of the `OMZ` tokens are sent to the contract deployer or one or several externally-owned account (EOA) addresses. This is a centralization risk because the deployer or the owner(s) of the EOAs can distribute tokens without obtaining the consensus of the community. Any compromise to these addresses may allow a hacker to steal and sell tokens on the market, resulting in severe damage to the project.
| Address | Chain | Source code |
|---|---|---|
| 0xd7d9…46760xd7d9babf56a66daff2ac5dc96f7e886c05124676 | Chain: Ethereum | Source code: Verified source |
1,044 projects reviewed · 1,375 reports · latest May 2025
See CertiK’s auditsSomething wrong on this page? A missing report, a wrong date, a finding that was fixed since. Tell us and we check it against its source.
Tell us