Glif Plus security review

HexensCode version: not recorded (see the report)

Hexens reviewed GLIF (Glif Plus security review) on 10 Dec 2025: 4 findings, 0 critical; 3 marked fixed, 1 acknowledged.

No open critical findings
Open the reportOpen GLIF’s security record

Report hosted on GitHub.

Trustblock does not review code.

Findings4

Statuses are the security firm’s own, from its report.

SeverityOpenAcknowledgedFixed
Critical000
High002
Medium000
Low011

Marked Informational by the firm. Not counted as findings.

InformationalExpired RWTFuture NFTs can never be burnedFixed

The report gives no description here.

InformationalInconsistent DEFAULT_FUTURE_EXPIRATION_PERIODFixed

The report gives no description here.

InformationalLpPlus mint emits unnormalised address parameterFixed

The report gives no description here.

InformationalMissing address normalisationFixed

The report gives no description here.

InformationalMissing events for LpPlus configuration state changesFixed

The report gives no description here.

InformationalMissing events for RWTFuture configuration state changesFixed

The report gives no description here.

InformationalRedundant balance check in _executeBatchFixed

The report gives no description here.

InformationalRedundant balance check in withdrawFilFundsFixed

The report gives no description here.

InformationalRedundant length checks in _claimBatchFixed

The report gives no description here.

Contracts in scope

No deployed address is recorded for this audit.

The report names a repository or files. Open the report to see its scope.

Part of GLIF’s security record

GLIF
Audits3 audits by 1 firmLast audit Dec 2025, by Hexens.
Critical findingsNo open critical findingsAcross the 3 reports, 1 critical finding was reported. It is marked fixed by the firm that reported it.
Open GLIF’s security record

Security firm

Hexens

32 projects reviewed · 75 reports · latest Jul 2026

See Hexens’s audits

Something wrong on this page? A missing report, a wrong date, a finding that was fixed since. Tell us and we check it against its source.

Tell us