CertiK reviewed Babydoge2.0 (Babydoge2.) on 4 Aug 2023: 12 findings, 0 critical; 1 marked fixed, 2 acknowledged, 9 open.
Report hosted on skynet.certik.com.
Trustblock does not review code.
Statuses are the security firm’s own, from its report.
| Severity | Open | Acknowledged | Fixed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Critical | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| High | 0 | 2 | 1 |
| Medium | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Low | 9 | 0 | 0 |
All of the `BabyDoge2` tokens are sent to the contract deployer or one or several externally-owned account (EOA) addresses. This is a centralization risk because the deployer or the owner(s) of the EOAs can distribute tokens without obtaining the consensus of the community. Any compromise to these addresses may allow a hacker to steal and sell tokens on the market, resulting in severe damage to the project.
The `internalSwap` function calls the `uniswapV2Router.swapExactTokensForETHSupportingFeeOnTransferTokens()` function to swap the `BabyDoge2` tokens to BNB/ETH and send the BNB/ETH to the `marketingWallet`/`marketing2Wallet` address. As a result, over time the `marketingWallet` and `marketing2Wallet` address will accumulate a significant portion BNB/ETH. If those are EOAs (Externally Owned Account), the mishandling of their private keys can have devastating consequences for the project as a whole. For the common deflationary token, the entire tokenomic requires certain liquidity to support. However, in the current implementation, the swapped BNB/ETH is transferred to the above-mentioned wallets and not used to add liquidity. Therefore, the entire tokenomic may crash due to lacking enough liquidity in the pool.
| Address | Chain | Source code |
|---|---|---|
| 0x41b6…46fd0x41b6f91daa1509bfbe06340d756560c4a1d146fd | Chain: Ethereum | Source code: Verified source |
| 0xa4e0…5ca40xa4e068e2b8f58e6c3090174a9e4e95f5bb025ca4 | Chain: Ethereum | Source code: Verified source |
| 0xa4e0…5ca40xa4e068e2b8f58e6c3090174a9e4e95f5bb025ca4 | Chain: BNB Chain | Source code: Verified source |
1,044 projects reviewed · 1,375 reports · latest May 2025
See CertiK’s auditsSomething wrong on this page? A missing report, a wrong date, a finding that was fixed since. Tell us and we check it against its source.
Tell us